Hoka Bondi 9 VS Clifton 10 VS Mach 6

Finding the right Hoka running shoe isn’t always straightforward, especially when multiple models offer a cushioned ride but in slightly different ways.

I’ve put each of these three Hoka running shoes through a range of workouts, from easy recovery days to everyday training for the Bondi 9 and Clifton 10, with some faster speed sessions in the Mach 6.

This Hoka Bondi 9 VS Clifton 10 VS Mach 6 comparison post will help you figure out which one of these popular Hoka running shoes, lines up best with your running habits or requirements for you next training plan.

Key specifications chart [Hoka Bondi 9 VS Clifton 10 VS Mach 6]

What’s good about all three

• All-day comfort: They each focus on cushioning and a relatively stable ride. Even the Mach 6, which is the most tempo-oriented of the bunch, has decent cushioning for medium distances if you need that extra protection.
• Breathable uppers: Across the board, Hoka uses mesh designs that offer solid airflow. The Bondi 9’s knit upper, Clifton 10’s jacquard knit, and Mach 6’s creel jacquard mesh are all reasonably ventilated, so you’re less likely to overheat on longer efforts but I’d say the Mach 6 is the most breathable out of the bunch.
• Smooth transitions: Each shoe uses some form of rocker geometry (MetaRocker, rearfoot rocker, or a blend). You’ll feel a gentle rolling sensation during toe-off, which I find reduces the slap on pavement and helps maintain an efficient, consistent stride.
• True-to-size fit: I went with my usual size in all of them, and they lined up with typical Hoka sizing. None felt excessively narrow or wide, although the Bondi 9 has the most volume out of the three.
• Durable outsole for most road runners: All three have placed rubber in high-impact zones – there’s not full coverage. You’ll see more outsole coverage on the Bondi 9 and the Mach 6, with a more targeted arrangement on the Clifton 10, which means that its outsole is the least durable.

What’s not so good about them

• Bondi 9 is heavier and bulkier: Its weight can be off-putting if you like to pick up the pace occasionally. Also, if you’re used to a lower stack or want more ground feel, the Bondi can feel a little clunky.
• Clifton 10 has exposed foam on the outsole, and a higher drop: The extra drop (8mm) could be noticeable for anyone who prefers a flatter platform. There’s also exposed foam on the outsole that will wear faster if you run on rough surfaces or scuff your feet – traction isnt great on these areas in the wet wither.
• Mach 6 has some tongue slippage: While it’s the lightest and most responsive, the Mach 6 isn’t built for runners who enjoy more cushioning or support, and the tongue has a tendency to slip downward a bit during runs, which can be an annoyance if you don’t lace carefully.
• Pricing: The Bondi 9 tops the chart at $170, with Clifton 10 at $150, and Mach 6 at a much more affordable $140.

My verdict and who each shoe is best for

The Hoka Bondi 9 is ideal for runners or walkers who prioritize maximum underfoot cushioning, whether for recovery runs, easy-paced efforts, or standing all day.

Its plush midsole absorbs impact well, making it a solid choice for anyone needing extra comfort. The fit accommodates medium-to-wide feet, particularly for neutral runners who prefer a soft, stable ride.

While it’s primarily a road shoe, it can also handle gentler paths thanks to its broad platform, which helps maintain balance and reduce foot fatigue over long periods.

The Hoka Clifton 10 serves as a versatile daily trainer, capable of handling everything from short jogs to mid-distance runs. It strikes a balance between soft cushioning and responsiveness, making it a reliable option for neutral runners who want a comfortable yet supportive ride.

With an 8mm drop (it used to be 5mm), it may feel more natural for heel strikers or those accustomed to traditional running shoe offsets.

It performs best on roads and light gravel, where its updated rubber outsole enhances durability a little. While it’s a dependable workhorse for daily miles, it isn’t designed for speed-focused training or racing – think about it as the most versatile daily trainer for beginners.

The Hoka Mach 6 is built for tempo runs, faster workouts, and shorter races (up to 10K). Its lightweight design and responsive midsole make it the most speed-oriented of the three, catering to runners who want a snappier ride and don’t mind the more firm / less cushioned feel underfoot.

Best suited for pavement or smooth paths, the Mach 6 thrives in scenarios where speed matters, but without sacrificing every last bit of cushioning.

It’s a great choice for those who enjoy picking up the pace while still having some protection underfoot – and you get all that at a very reasonable price.

Looking for other alternatives?

These three models cover a broad range of shoe types from the cushion-heavy daily trainer of the Bondi 9, the middle-ground daily trainer of the Clifton 10, and the speed trainer Mach 6.

But if you’re still on the fence, be sure to visit my Best Max Cushioned Running Shoes roundup, Best Daily Trainers roundup, and Best Speed Trainers roundup for more options in each of those three categories.

There are other shoes out there from other brands, that might line up better with your style, foot shape, or budget, and I’ve highlighted the ones I find most reliable for everyday use, plus a few that excel for faster workouts in those roundups listed above.

I hope this comparison makes the decision a little clearer. Let me know which model piques your interest or if you’ve tried any of them already. Happy running! -Alastair

➡ Enjoy this comparison? Subscribe to my newsletter and Youtube Channel, for more authentic, honest, and reliable running shoe reviews just like this one.